Difference between revisions of "Nonprofit Online Communications 101: Four Processes for Online Advocacy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (1 revision imported) |
m |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
* For example, Mon. look at what partners are doing | * For example, Mon. look at what partners are doing | ||
Grantees | Grantees | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category: 2013 Sacramento]][[Category:Comms]] |
Latest revision as of 21:09, 4 May 2016
Who was there?
- Colin - Sustainable cmte, Coalition on Region Equity, Capitol Cary Duerte Walk Sac
- Adam Ward, Mid-City CAN
- David Gaines, center multicultural cooperation - Getting info, new format for Newsletter
- Mackenzie Williams, Del Norte, Red Wood Voice managing editor - getting word out about our program locally statewide, nationwide, website and Facebook page
- Alberto Mercado, Asian Resources, seven steps of communication plan analyzing matrix, youth media team
- David Dexter, statewide California Pan Ethnic Health Network - evaluation and click-through rates, 14-15 percent open rate for emails is good
.e-benchmarksstudy.com
- Aspiration Request for Proposal tool for Website
- Aspiration smaller reach on Facebook v. Twitter but more interaction
Four processes online communication
- Audience
- Frequency
- Publishing matrix spreadsheet to recycle content
- Message calendar
- Build story up to move people
- Analytics
- How use at Aspiration
- Tracking document send out to all staff every week
- Events drive website at Aspiration
- First of year
- Oct. Nov. Dev. Summit
- Alberto seven step communication plan
- For example, Mon. look at what partners are doing
Grantees